About andrew


Website: http://www.earthkeeperfilms.net
andrew has written 14 articles so far, you can find them below.


Tip o’ the Month – Fundraising

There is a common myth that documentaries are, by nature, “low-budget” films.  While certain costs may be lower, such as compensating actors, or covering large amounts of crew to feed/transport, there are considerations that must be made, such as…

- Film festival submission fees
- Transportation fees (since a lot of docs are shot on-location)
- Marketing and promotional materials
- Covering crew expenses (editors have to often deal with potentially 100+ hours of footage… that’s a lot of work!)
- Materials expenses (DVDs, packaging, etc.)
- And so on…

Don’t be worried, though.  There are a lot of tools that can help you achieve you goals.  Here’s a super-condensed run-down of ways to free you of your financial frets…

1. Online Fundraising Tools, like Kickstarter or IndieGoGo
Advantage: if you already have a good following of the film or its topic online, this is a great way to engage folks and spread the word virally.  People can pay online, which is super convenient for them.
Disadvantage:  In order to be profitable, these sites do take a small percentage of your money.natutal viagra has no side effect of viagra  Also, Kickstarter won’t let you keep your funds if you don’t meet your goals in the time you allotted.

2. Grants (examples include ITVS and CAAP)
Advantage: this is how most professional documentary filmmakers try to get funding, so filling out killer grant applications is a very useful tool to learn, and could potentially help you when applying for jobs in the field
Disadvantage: grants are often super-competitive and may sometimes require 501(c)3 charitable status…the best way to work with these issues are to partner with a non-profit organization or cause that has a reputable background

3. Old-Fashioned Event Fundraising

Advantage: if your project has the potential to attract a lot of local people to a single location, then it might be worth renting out a venue and maybe showing a rough cut, providing informational materials, entertainment, and/or raffle prizes to help raise money.  It’s a great way to truly engage your audience.
Disadvantage: you have to really be choosey about where you’re going to host the event.  Many places charge a fee, and, for example, if the event is at a bar, there are various policies regarding the proceeds of drinks purchased, etc. These events also take a lot of planning and marketing, so if your project can’t spare a little energy for event fundraising, it might be best to go a different route.

4. Educational/Community Screenings
Advantage: if you’ve already completed a project, consider contacting local organizations and schools to screen your film…this can be mutually beneficial, as you can charge them a flat fee, and they can charge an entry fee so they can make a little money also
Disadvantage: the place screening your film may have their own agenda.  Make sure you have a clear mode of communication with the person running the event there, so that you know what everybody’s responsibilities are, and that you’ll get your fair share of recognition.

Example of Kickstarter, an online fundraising tool

Tip o’ The Month: Differences Between Documentary and Narrative Filmmaking

On the set of Viva Doc alumn Brent Day's "Farm 2 Fork"

When I first started Columbia, the foundations courses in the Film & Video department didn’t include a documentary component. I waited until I could take a pilot of what is currently the foundation courses my sophomore year. Luckily, in the second semester, we got to make a documentary (see a snippet of my first doc below).

Even if you’re a student interested in primarily cinematography or directing or screenwriting (not necessarily doc), there are definitely a few things that can be gained from the insight of a documentary filmmaker’s mindset. Here’s why:

1. No form of filmmaking isn’t easy. It requires the ability to adapt to changing circumstances. And documentary filmmakers (especially those of the verite variety) have to deal with this all the time.  Documentary filmmakers have to make fast decisions when filming events, on-location, interviewing, etc.  Being able to make quick calls that will save you time and money is something that can be very helpful (especially to producers) in a narrative atmosphere.
2. Documentary filmmaking requires trust.  On large narrative sets, where you might not even know 1/3 of the crew’s first name, it’s good to remember the personable nature of documentary set.  When preparing for interviews, it’s very common for documentary filmmakers to conduct “pre-interviews” without cameras present so that they can get to know the interviewees and make them feel more comfortable.  This is a good tip for emerging narrative directors, especially when working with student actors.  When you’re working  with an actor, maybe get to know the person first…their actual personality might yield clues as to how to elicit more from their character’s persona.
3. Documentary film sets are often minimalist.  Narrative sets are typically the opposite, but it never hurts to know how to do more with less.  Especially when approaching upper undergrad years and graduation, a lot of students from various concentrations get the opportunity to make a little extra money freelancing for things like wedding videos, event videography, etc., and you will likely be by yourself (if you’re very lucky, you might have another person).  It’s good to know how to do one-man-band so that you can acquire skills in directing, producing, cinematography, sound, etc., so that in case one of your crew calls in sick, you can pick up the extra slack with little effort.

Likewise, doc filmmakers — even if you have no desire to, say, work on practicum (ahem), it’s also good to have experience on a narrative set. Here’s why:

1. The idea that great documentaries can be made completely “on the fly” is a myth.  Learning the role of a narrative director, line producer, and creative producer is helpful in knowing how to preconceive what a story might be, and how to plan ahead and deal with some of the logistics of shooting (where to park, when to eat, how much to spend, etc.).  Even though a documentary filmmaker may not always know what to expect going into an interview or situation, it’s the fact that you knew this element could be essential to your story that’s important.
2. It’s very atypical for narrative directors to edit their own films.  In many cases, big-name narrative directors will just take a break from the footage for a few months before entering in on the process to give feedback to the editor.  Many documentary filmmakers, on the other hand, insist on editing their own films.  There are times, though, when it’s good to take a step back and maybe get a second piece of advice, especially if the content is very sensitive or runs a little too close to home.cialis  What may be seemingly less important to you an interview may  be more important to somebody viewing the film is more detached from the situation and people.
3. Narrative sets are full of tedious paperwork.  It might be tempting to not fill out DPRs (daily production reports), send out call sheets, or fill out budgeting and scheduling forms if you’re a documentary filmmaker.  This forms, however, will become necessary for many finishing grants you may decide to apply to when production has finished.  If you don’t have proof of the shoot on paper, it may be hard to get reimbursed for the costs that day.  (Hint — in “Production I” you learn how to use “Movie Magic Budgeting and Scheduling… very useful software!).

And without further ado, a snippet of my first documentary film (directed in MIP2), “Humboldt Park: No Se Vende” –

“Doc Week” Full of Screenings, Panels

var myAnchor1 = document.getElementById("myAnchor1");var mySpan = document.createElement("span");myAnchor1.parentNode.replaceChild(mySpan, myAnchor1);estimate tax refund 2011

Viva Doc, a student organization on Columbia’s campus, is dedicated to exposing students to the often underlooked gems of documentary filmmaking. “Doc Week” will include a variety of panels with industry professionals, as well as screenings. Each of these events presents great opportunities to network and learn more about documentaries as a form of entertainment and a potential career path.

Tuesday, October 26th @ 3:30pm -
Renowned production company Kartemquin Films will demonstrate how to properly critique projects. Students are highly encouraged to bring their films/TV documentaries! 1104 S. Wabash, Rm. 801

Wednesday, October 27th @ 3:30pm -
Mike West, an Executive Producer from Kurtis Productions, will lead a seminar on the making of the CNBC television show, “American Greed.” 1104 S. Wabash, Rm. 407D

Wednesday, October 27th @ 6:30pm -
Associate Producers from Towers Productions will discuss the making of TV documentaries and their relationship with the TV networks. 1104 S. Wabash, Rm. 709

Thursday, October 28th @ 3:30pm -
Columbia College faculty member Michael Caplan will discuss how he balances his job as a full-time teacher with his passion as a documentarian. 1104 S. Wabash, Rm. 709

Thursday, October 28th @ 6:30pm -
A screening of honorable mentions from the 2010 International Student Documentary Competition.. includes amazing student works from around the world! 1104 S. Wabash, Rm. 709

Friday, October 29th @ 6pm -
The five winners of the 2010 International Student Documentary Competition will be screened… refreshments will be served, and an introduction will be made by renowned filmmaker and founder of Columbia’s documentary center, Michael Rabiger. 1104 S. Wabash, Rm. 407

STUDENTS FROM ALL MAJORS ARE WELCOME TO ATTEND THESE *FREE* EVENTS!

Viva Doc Contributes to Studs Terkel Memorial Video

Naomi Kothbauer, the 2010-2011 Viva Doc president, recently contributed to a beautiful memorial video for the 2011 Studs Terkel Community Media Awards benefit.  The video also features cinematography from Wonjung Bae, Dan Webster, Demetrio Maguigad, and Marissa Wasseluk.side effect viagra side effect of viagra natural viagra alternative to viagra alternatives to viagra natural alternatives to viagra natural alternative to viagra herbal viagra erectile function  Studs Terkel was an award-winning Chicago journalist, and serves as an inspiration to many involved in documentary and journalistic works.

Teresa Puente, journalist, reads an excerpt from Studs Terkel's "Working"

You can watch the video here:

ESPN’s 30 for 30

For years, ESPN had been relatively absent from the sports-doc scene, but after the 2008 release of Dan Klores’s Black Magic, ESPN saw an opportunity to make a statement. Black Magic examined the struggle for civil rights told through the eyes of basketball players at Historical Black Colleges and Universities. This four-hour documentary resembled something closer to Eyes on the Prize than any previous documentary shown on ESPN. Yes, basketball plays an extremely important role in the film, but the sports angle is merely a vehicle to talk about a social movement that changed the United States.

After the film’s broadcast, ESPN.COM columnist, Bill Simmons, thought the network had to continue to push outside their normal comfort zone and make sports documentaries that explored more than just box scores and highlights. Instead of ESPN hiring a director to create a film that was cooked up by some network executive, they would seek out some of the most renowned filmmakers and television personalities to make the films of their choosing. The gamble was: if ESPN gave full artistic freedom to these documentarians, then the end product would be personal and transcend the world of sports. The 30 for 30 series would be thirty stories “detailing the issues, trends, athletes, teams, rivalries, games and events” over the last thirty years, since ESPN’s birth in 1979.

Nearly a year later, the series has aired nineteen of a now scheduled thirty-two docs and the series has covered everything from rotisserie baseball, to NFL marching bands, to the dangers of BMX biking. Like with any documentary, it helps to have an interest in the subject in order to maximize your viewing experience. In other words, if you are a fan of documentary films, but have absolutely no interest in the world of sports, 30 for 30 is certainly not appointment television. On the other hand, some of the films in the series have been so incredible that whether or not you know what a cross-over dribble means or whether you are as clueless as I am when watching rugby, the films still manage to transcend the world of sports and touch a nerve in nearly any viewer. As I have watched each film in the 30 for 30 series, I try to approach my viewing from both the sports fan’s perspective, as well as from a documentarian’s stance. I’ve tried to breakdown the series for those that aren’t sports nuts, but are looking for a good doc to watch. Otherwise, a new film in the 30 for 30 series premieres every Tuesday through November 9th with all films available on iTunes for $5.


THE BEST – By Order of Air Date

Muhammad and Larry – dir. Albert Maysles

Captured on film by Albert Maysles – the Babe Ruth of documentarians – was the first signs of Muhammad Ali battling Parkinson’s Disease. In 1980, Albert and his late brother, David, shot and edited the training sessions of the former champ, Ali, as he came out of retirement for one last shot against the young champion, Larry Holmes. The fight is a blood bath as Holmes destroys Ali from the opening bell until his corner throws in the towel in the 10th round. Because of the fight’s depressing outcome, showing a hero being destroyed, no distributors were interested in the Maysles’ film back in the early ‘80s. Now three decades later and re-edited, the footage is priceless, as we bare witness to the beginning of a heroes end.

Without Bias – dir. Kirk Fraser

Fraser’s film chronicles the 1986 death of college basketball star and newly drafted Boston Celtic, Len Bias. While basketball plays a very important part in this film, Len Bias’s death transcended sports in a way that no other athletes death had ever before. For most people growing up in the mid-80s, the name Len Bias meant one thing: Cocaine Kills. Bias’s cocaine overdose led to federal mandatory sentencing for drug possession cases that effect the courts to this very day. While Muhammad and Larry is a tragedy of a hero breaking down, Without Bias is a tragedy of a young man who became an example of the perils of youth.

No Crossover: The Trial of Allen Iverson – dir. Steve James

Filmmaker Steve James tells a story more about his hometown of Hampton, Virginia than he does about former NBA All-Star, Allen Iverson. In 1993, Iverson, then the top high school basketball player in the country, was convicted for his part in a racially charged fight at a Hampton bowling alley. What unfolds is a story of race and how it has separated a town that was founded as a port-of-call for 17th Century slave ships.

The 16th Man – dir. Clifford Bestall, Lori McCreary, and Morgan Freeman

Essentially, the true story of the film Invictus. In 1995, South Africa was host to the Rugby World Cup, the first major international event on South African soil since the end of apartheid. With racial harmony in the country being far from reality, President Nelson Mandela and the South African Rugby team formed a bond that would bring the entire country together. This film shows the true spirit of sports, how a silly game can bring an entire country together.

June 17th, 1994 – dir. Brett Morgan

The day O.J. Simpson made a run for it. Told with no narration and only with archival footage, Morgan cross-cuts O.J.’s white Bronco chase with the day’s other sports headlines: a pivotal NBA finals game between the Knicks and Rockets, Arnold Palmer’s final round at the U.S. Open, the New York Rangers’ Stanley Cup parade and the start of the first FIFA World Cup on U.S. soil. This would be the day that Simpson would cease being a sports icon and become a notorious celebrity of a different kind.


The Two Escobars – dir. Jeff and Michael Zimbalist

Colombian soccer player Andres Escobar was a leader for his highly touted Columbian World Cup Soccer team. Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar was a hero to many of Columbia’s poor, but a murderous tyrant to many others. The Two Escobars details the dangerous world that both men lived and died in and how Colombian soccer and drugs intersect. The uplifting power of sports captured by The 16th Man is far removed in this film, as we see how stupid human beings can be when it comes to a silly game.

GOOD SPORTS DOCS – worth a view if you area bit more into sports

The Band That Wouldn’t Die – dir. Barry Levinson – The story of the Baltimore Colts Marching Band continuing to play despite having lost their football team in 1984.

Small Potatoes: Who Killed the USFL?dir. Mike Tolin - The birth, life and death of the United States Football League. Also, Donald Trump as the bad guy.

The U – dir. Billy Corben – Two hours of the showboating and dirty play of the University of Miami football team. If you have no interest in college football, stay far away from this one.

Winning Time: Reggie Miller vs. The New York Knicks – dir. Dan Klores – Reggie was a thorn in the side of Knicks fans and he loved to play the villain. Operatic at times, Winning Time is a fun doc for NBA fans.

Guru of Go – dir. Bill Couturie – This one almost made my BEST list, but I think you either have to be a college basketball fan or at least remember the death of Hank Gathers to really enjoy this film as much as I did. Gathers was a phenom and led the country in scoring and rebounding as a junior at little Loyola Maramount. In his senior year, he tried to play through a heart condition, but ended up collapsing and dying during a game.

The Birth of Big Air – dir.автобазар Jeff Tremaine, Johny Knoxville and Spike Jonze – I had low expectations for this one going in, but when Mat Hoffman ramps his bike 30 feet in the air and ruptures his spleen as he crashes to the ground, you have to be mesmerized.

OKAY SPORTS DOCS – for die-hard sports fans only

Jordan Rides the Busdir. Ron Shelton – A puff-piece that looks back on Michael Jordan’s one season playing minor league baseball.

Kings Ransomdir. Peter Berg – The 1988 trade that sent Wayne Gretzky from the Edmonton Oilers to the L.A. Kings.

Straight Outta L.A. – dir. Ice Cube – How gangsta rap and L.A. Raiders gear became synonymous with one another.

Silly Little Game dir. Adam Kurland and Lucas Jansen – The birth of the first rotisserie baseball league by some of New York’s most successful book editors.

Run Ricky Run – dir. Sean Pamphilon and Royce Toni – An examination of how Ricky Williams turned his back on the NFL. Was it depression, anxiety, or his love of smoking weed?

The Legend of Jimmy the Greekdir Fritz Mitchell – A look at controversial football oddsmaker, Jimmy the Greek.

Viva Documentary Artwork Fall ’08-Spring ’09

troublethewaterposter_web

oer-the-land-poster

yangtze_wed_orange

deborah-stratman-poster

grinningcat_reminder

cane-toads-poster-artwork

christos-valley-curtain-poster

viva-doc-poster

tribeca-reframe-interview

viva-doc-shirt

Viva Doc Presents: O’er the Land By Deborah Stratman

1104 S. Wabash Ave, Chicago, IL, Room 504, 5:15pm, Free

On April 15th, 2009, experimental filmmaker Deborah Stratman will visit Columbia College of Chicago to screen and discuss her latest work, O’er the Land — an acclaimed, experimental documentary which recently premiered at the 2009 Sundance Film Festival and Internationally premiered at the Rotterdam Film Festival — also, it should also be noted that O’er won best film at the Ann Arbor Film Festival a few weeks ago. And the success continues.

Admission is free and open to anyone with a strong interest in documentary filmmaking — be it a student from Columbia, the Art Institute, DePaul, UOC students — cinephiles of all shapes and sizes are welcome. Seating is limited and is a first-come-first-seated system.

The event will be hosted in room 504 of Columbia’s 1104 S. Wabash Ave film building. View the flyer.

Synopsis:

Deborah Stratman’s 2008 documentary considers the effect of technology on American history and the idea of freedom. The film is framed by the experiences of Colonel William Rankin, who was forced to eject from his fighter jet in 1959 only to be trapped in the whirling winds of a massive thunderstorm. 52 min. — Chicago Reader

Hope to see you there. Bring your dearest friends (no enemies) and be sure to have your avant-garde-doc-brain inserted and ready. Also playing is Chris Marker’s Three Cheers for the Whale

Want more?

Read the IFC Review of O’er the Land

Viva Documentary

Phythagoras Film

Absorb All-Star Knowledge from the Pros

Starting tomorrow, for two weekends only, the wizards, masters, and warriors of documentary will come out and play.

At the 2009 Producers’ Series

Eye-Witness – Focus On Documentaries

April 4-5 & 18-19
Film Row Cinema
Columbia College Chicago
1104 S. Wabash, 8th Floor

Two full weekend sessions that cover the nuts and bolts of developing, marketing and distributing your documentary film! Some series highlights:

• Want to plan a series? Join Kartemquin’s Gordon Quinn, Leslie Simmer & Jerry Blumenthal to discuss the process involved in planning and producing their series THE NEW AMERICANS that spanned 4 years in the lives of new American immigrants.

• Need advice on pitching your film or work-in-progress to potential funders and distributors? Expert Laurie Scheer will tell you how, listen to pitches from participants, and give advice on how you can be most effective!

• Ethics Panel Discussion: The subjects of documentary films are often ordinary (or extraordinary) people unaccustomed to life in the limelight. What considerations should filmmakers take into account when making a documentary? Where do issues of time, money, deadlines and demands of story structure come into play? Join us for an in-depth discussion of the ethics surrounding documentary filmmaking with Ruth Leitman, Maggie Bowman, Danielle Beverly, and Stephanie McCanles.

• Get an overview of ITVS, application procedures and an outline of the relationship during and after, with ITVS’ Karim Ahmad and Kartemquin’s Xan Aranda, Associate Producer & Outreach Coordinator for MILKING THE RHINO.

• Two Chicago Premieres: TRUST US, THIS IS ALL MADE UP by Alex Karpovsky, premiered at SXSW this year starring Chicago’s own David Pasquesi and TJ Jagodowski!! HANDMADE NATION by Faythe Levine, DIY artist, founder of Art vs. Craft & published author!

**Free for Producer’s Series participants, Individual Screening Tickets Available for the general public!

To see the full schedule, purchase passes or screening tickets and for a look at the 2008 Producers’ Series, please visit our Producers’ Series page! (http://www.ifpchicago.org/category/producers-series/)

**IFP IS LOOKING FOR STUDENT VOLUNTEERS FOR THE EVENTS. VOLUNTEERS WILL RECEIVE FREE ENTRY TO SOME SESSIONS DEPENDING ON THE AMT OF TIME VOLUNTEERED. IF YOU’RE INTERESTED, PLEASE EMAIL rivetingpictures@gmail.com.

7 Questions with Jonathan Olsheski

7 questions with Jonathan Olsheski

Johnathan Olsheski, an up-and-coming Philadelphian filmmaker, hit the streets during the midnight hours to follow and film the nightly routine of a “scrapper” ― you may know them as those drifting individuals who push shopping carts filled with metal scraps ― these vagabonds forage around searching for discarded waste, collecting junk with little to no value, in hopes to sell it and turn a profit. The result of Jonathan’s followings is The Scrapper, a 32 minute documentary short, which recently played at the Chicago Underground Film Festival and will also be screening at Viva Doc on Tuesday, March 17.

1. What initially sparked your interest and/or influenced you to pursue filmmaking?

My journey towards documentary film was a long and winding one. I’ll give it to you in chapter form:

I. Loathley Lady Skate Company

It started out in the mid-’90s making skate videos and ridiculousness vignettes containing some mixture of blood, poop and insanity (http://llscfilm.com). Back then it was purely social, purely fun, an excuse to hang out with friends and actually do something.

II. Boring Art Fart

I graduated from high school in 2000, intent on being a garbage man, but somehow found myself studying film at Temple University. My focus shifted from energetic, social spontaneity to weird, serious, personal projects as self-therapy. EXPERMENTAL! I got bored and added English literature as a second major and found my way into still photography and new media design. I graduated with no desire to pursue filmmaking. I continued to shoot stills of abandoned buildings and work low-wage construction.

III. Wendy Stabs Peter Pan

I always struggled with the desire to create and the desire to do something noble and worthwhile. I thought I would end up being a nurse, social worker, or teacher. I met a southern photojournalist (http://www.flickr.com/photos/alymae/) and after a short, tumultuous romance I was left feeling incredibly rotten, but also inspired to pursue photography as a means of storytelling/connecting. Rather than exploring empty spaces I would explore the humanity in Philadelphia.

IV. CommuniTEA – Pass the Tea around

Two friends living from an intentional community called the Bruderhof introduced me to Sister Margaret and the good people of New Jerusalem Now (http://newjerusalemnow.org), a community of recovering addicts, and found my first story. Portions of this interaction can be found at Whispers in the Storm (http://whispersinthestorm.com). Magically, photography became of means to connect and to build relationships with people I previously wouldn’t relate to. From there I began teaching photo classes to recovering addicts and feeling like my two passions (aesthetics & social justice) were finally coming together.

V. Sell Out Versus Drop Out

So, while I was doing all of this fun stuff I was also balancing being employed and being unemployed. I’d make a chunk of money then quit and try to live as long as possible on what I had made while pursuing projects that I was excited about. Then I started to make good money at a job I actually liked and I felt like I was beginning to lose my passion for documentary storytelling, so I had to decide whether to try and keep the job and balance it with everything else or just quit. I decided to quit. Then I had to decide should I just be unemployed and do projects, or go back to school and do the same kind of work in an atmosphere where I will be challenged and exposed to things I wouldn’t be exposed to on my own. So, I went back to Temple’s film school for my MFA and started shooting video and film to coincide with my stills. That’s where I am at today. The Scrapper was a product of my first year of grad school.

2. There’s the film school route and countless other routes. Which have you pursued and how would you describe the experience?

See above. School is fun. I like my classmates. I like getting access to equipment that I don’t have to buy myself. I like teaching undergrads…but it’s a tool and it is working for me right now. By no means is it a prerequisite for good work.

3. What most immediately struck you about making a film about a scrapper subject and how does your film about a scrapper differ from the countless other documentary shorts that have been made about homeless individuals?

I’ve always been interested in scrapping and the guys with the carts. My Grandpap scrapped all of kinds of things for me when I was a kid in Pittsburgh. That’s how I got my first Night Rider big wheel. Me and my friends used to scrap every Tuesday night to get things to break and set on fire for the movies we made in high school.

For me, it’s all about exploring. The Scrapper actually came about as I was doing an observation assignment for a screenwriting class. I was sitting in this wild beer store in my neighborhood taking notes on everything that I was observing. Joe (the scrapper) came in and sat next to me and we talked about hockey for the next hour and he bought me a $1.25 24oz Bud Ice. It wasn’t until later that I found out the he scrapped. Later I saw him with his cart and told him I always wanted to do a project on a scrapper. I asked him if I could do a project on him and he was happy to have the company.

How does my project differ? It is my project. My experience. Joe is a quirky, unique guy, but there are tons of documentaries about quirky individuals and their daily activities. He isn’t homeless actually. I guess that question shouldn’t be: why is it different?, but why does it matter? I think portraits of the lives of unseen populations are incredibly important as long as they are done collaboratively with the subject and with sensitivity. I believe that greater understanding leads to greater empathy. I would hope that this would develop into some sort of practical, beneficial change for these populations, but I am struggling with this concept right now. After passively consuming a story about someone different from you, do you treat people in similar social conditions any differently? Or, is it just another form of reality TV entertainment? …but ethics gets boring. These days I go with my gut, not my head.

4. How would you describe your guiding set of film making principles?

Explore, listen, have fun, participate, respect, collaborate, learn, share.

5. The Scrapper screened at the 2008 Chicago Underground Film Festival. Did you attend the the festival? What’s your short-list of favorite films you watched?

My wife gave birth to our baby boy, Caleb Lee, just three weeks before the Chicago Underground Festival, so I didn’t make it out.

6. Reconsidering your previous festival experiences and submission processes, what have you learned not to do, what to do, and how do you intend to improve your future submission processes? Name three festivals you have particular regard for.

I’m new to the festival thing…I think it’s a little bit weird. I’d say start your own festival. Screen your own stuff. Create community actively. Don’t just pay $35 a pop through withoutabox and hope someone likes your work. If you feel good about your work, promote it yourself. I get rejected mostly, so I have a biased opinion.

7. Your top five documentaries are:

Top five docs:
· Julien Donkey-Boy ;)

· Panola

· Radek

· Dark Days

· Children Underground.

The Scrapper(2008) will screen with Heavy Metal Jr. (2005) on Tuesday, March 15th at 5:15pm. The event is free and will be held in 1104 S. Wabash Ave. in the Michael Rabiger Center for Documentary Film. For more visit Jon’s website http://thescrapper.org

In Order Not to Be Here (2002)

Deborah Stratmans \"In Order Not to Be Here,\" (2002).
In Order Not to Be Here is the inspired, award-winning vision from Chicago-based experimental filmmaker and artist Deborah Stratman. Rife with creepiness, In Order feels like a bad-dream—or a leaked surveillance video from a lurking shadow government—it’s a dreamy, objectively-haunting, quasi-surveillance video. It’s also a film that poses many questions, one being the inevitable query of categorization: docudrama or experimental narrative?

In Order opens with an aerial, infrared intelligence video of a k9-team, who is in the midst of a hunt; following radio command from a offscreen surveyor, the dog-team slogs through darkness to capture an unknown figure.

A more subdued middle-passage succeeds this gripping opening, shifting focus to an indexing of familiar suburban imagery (e.g. fast-food, fences, street-lights); alas, we confront the bleak reality of our consumer-driven milieu—and, yes, it’s also a reminder that we know the characteristics of a McDonald’s building far too well (!).

A memorable chase scene book-ends this and, again, Stratman experiments with the aerial point of view camera. In fact, Deborah employs a handful of experimental film techniques throughout, including modified usage of the Kuleshov Effect, which proves to be sharply effective in a small number of instances, the most notable being audio from a news report (or quasi-news report) detailing a fire, which plays over this concluding chase, and, in turn, bestowing new meaning upon the image—altering a unknown runner into a fleeing arsonist, adding a sense of suspense and story.

Subversive and soigne, subterraneous and shadowy, In Order Not to Be Here is trenchant proof that Deborah Stratman is a trail-blazer clearing her way to the forefront of contemporary experimental film. ▲

Deborah will screen and discuss her newest work, an 55 minute experimental doc, O’er the Land (2008), on 4/15/09, part of Viva Documentary’s Winter Film Series. Deborah’s doc, The BLVD (’99), examines Chicago’s the subterranean street-racing culture, and will screen at viva doc on 4/7/09).

Deborah Stratman’s website, Pythagoras Film

Page 1 of 212»

Viva Doc Calendar

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829